The Sentencing of Indigenous Offenders in the Lower Courts: A Study of Three Australian Jurisdictions
نویسندگان
چکیده
The views expressed are the responsibility of the author and are not necessarily those of the Council.
منابع مشابه
Australia's National Research and Knowledge Centre on Crime and Justice Indigenous Disparity in Lower Court Imprisonment Decisions: a Study of Two Australian Jurisdictions, 1998 to 2008 Explaining Disparity in the Imprisonment Sentencing Decision
There are few systematic investigations of lower court sentencing, even though this is where the majority of offenders are sentenced and baseline statistics show Indigenous people receive relatively harsher sanctions than non-Indigenous offenders (in New South Wales, see Baker 2001; in South Australia, see Castle & Barnett 2000). This paper explores the probability of Indigenous versus non-Indi...
متن کاملSentencing Guidelines for Copyright Pirates in the United States and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: A Comparative Perspective
As more and more nations prosecute copyright piracy cases, it is far from clear whether these nations, in seeking to protect legitimate copyright interests, will also recognize the need to achieve three goals in the sentencing of such cases. The first is honesty in sentencing: that is, avoiding situations in which the nominal sentence that a court initially imposes at sentencing may later be su...
متن کاملA Multilevel Analysis of County and State Variation in the Severity of Sentences Imposed in Large Urban Courts
This study explored the structural sources behind variability in the sentences applied to felons convicted in state courts located across the U.S. Multilevel regression models were used to explore whether various state and county-level attributes help to account for why defendants experience a significantly higher probability of incarceration versus probation in certain jurisdictions. Drawing u...
متن کاملHow do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account
In jurisdictions with two or more tiers of criminal courts, some defendants can choose the type of trial court to be tried in. This may involve a trade-off between the probability of acquittal/conviction and the estimated severity of sentence if convicted. For instance, in England and Wales, the lower courts have a higher conviction rate but limited sentencing powers, whereas the higher courts ...
متن کاملThe Effect of Federalization on the Defense Function
he increasing federalization of crime gives rise to concurrent state and federal jurisdiction over most crimes. This dual jurisdiction enables prosecutors to choose whether to prosecute in state or federal courts. It is generally easier to obtain conviction in federal courts, and there is usually a large differential in the possible punishment under the different systems, with the federal syste...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011